critique

type CritiqueReport struct {
	// Assumptions are stated or unstated assumptions the plan relies on.
	Assumptions []string `json:"assumptions"`

	// Gaps are missing tasks or steps the plan forgot to include.
	Gaps []string `json:"gaps"`

	// Ordering lists sequencing issues — tasks that appear in the wrong order
	// or whose dependencies create logical conflicts.
	Ordering []string `json:"ordering"`

	// Alternatives are other approaches worth considering instead of the current plan.
	Alternatives []string `json:"alternatives"`

	// Verdict is the overall adversarial verdict: a short, punchy conclusion.
	Verdict string `json:"verdict"`
}